INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES  INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES
US Army Corps of Engineers
US Army Corps of Engineers
     

National Drought Atlas

PALMER INDEX DATA

The National Drought Atlas statistical analysis of Palmer Index Data is not available on-line.

The Palmer Drought Severity Index (Palmer, 1965) is calculated by a soil moisture accounting procedure based on precipitation and temperature for estimating evapotranspiration by the Thornthwaite method. Ordinarily, the Index is calculated for state climatic divisions. The National Climatic Data Center recalculated the Palmer Drought Severity Index for the National Drought Atlas on a station-by-station basis rather than a climatic division basis for the period of record of 1,035 stations in the Historical Climatology Network.

Unadjusted precipitation totals from this data set were used (see Precipitation section for a discussion of adjustments). Time series go back from 1990 (except from 1988 or 1989 for a few sites) to at least 1930 after allowing for an initialization period of four years. Computations require not only serially complete monthly temperature and precipitation data, but also soil water capacities, coefficients for computing potential evapotranspiration, and weighting factors.  The values of these latter constants and factors that were used for the at-site computations were the values on file at the National Climatic Data Center that are representative of the climatic division in which the site is located. Although not examined, the use of climatic division values was not thought to significantly impact the at-site modified Palmer Index computations. The resulting estimates should be superior to other estimates which have been calculated to date.

In order to calculate the Palmer Index, missing data had to be estimated. In addition, some of the monthly precipitation totals are the sum of daily values for less than a full month, i.e., some of the monthly data are partial totals. Because of the localized nature of precipitation, there is no generalized, accepted method of obtaining meteorologically reliable estimates of missing data.

A simple precipitation estimation procedure was used that is based on the assumption that, even though precipitation is a localized phenomenon, an average monthly total over a small area should be reasonably representative of any site within the area. A missing total for a given month and year was estimated by averaging the totals for the month and year for all stations in the National Climatic Data Center's Summary of the Month digital data base that are within 60 miles of the station with the missing data. The number of nearby stations whose totals were averaged varied from 1 to 87. The number of stations depends on the density of the station network (most dense in the Northeast and least dense in the Rocky Mountains) and the year (fewer stations in the earlier years of the period of record). If digital data were not available, Climatological Data publications were examined, and the published recorded or estimated values for the month and year in question at the Historical Climatology Network station were used. The publications were also used to obtain a small number of values to extend the length of record of the temperature records (the length of record of the temperature data at a site is often shorter than that of precipitation data).

If a station had a partial precipitation total for a given month and year, the average of the totals for the nearly stations was computed and compared to the partial total. The higher of the partial total or nearby comparisons were made between a nearby station average and a partial total. The nearby station average was higher than the partial total for 60 percent of the comparisons and lower for 40 percent.  These percentages subjectively confirm the difficulty in estimating monthly precipitation amounts over a small area and add credibility to the decision to use the unadjusted data from the Historical Climatology Network for the precipitation analysis.

Note that the number of stations for which the drought index has been computed is less than the number of stations for which precipitation probabilities have been computed. It was necessary to eliminate some stations from the drought computations because of inadequate data. The inadequacies resulted from the requirement that both temperature and precipitation data had to be serially complete from 1926 onward. If either the temperature or precipitation data were not available and missing data could not be estimated because of lack of digital or published data from nearby stations, then the Palmer Index could not be computed.

Return to Main Page, National Drought Atlas

Precipitation

Streamflow

revised 1 Aug 2006

 
 

 


Return to National Drought Atlas home

Precipitation

Streamflow

     
Building Strong
iSaluteURL USACEURL ArmyURL YouTubeURL BlogURL FacebookURL FlickrURL TwitterURL